https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18450 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the government's rejection order, and directed approval of the agreement dated August 25, 1974, under section 80RRA of the Income-tax Act. The court clarified that the provision does not require the agreement to postdate its enactment, making the petitioner's husband eligible for benefits. The government's rejection reasons were deemed invalid, and as no other disqualifying grounds existed, the court mandated the government to approve the agreement within four weeks. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:46:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18450 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the government's rejection order, and directed approval of the agreement dated August 25, 1974, under section 80RRA of the Income-tax Act. The court clarified that the provision does not require the agreement to postdate its enactment, making the petitioner's husband eligible for benefits. The government's rejection reasons were deemed invalid, and as no other disqualifying grounds existed, the court mandated the government to approve the agreement within four weeks. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18450