https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381303 The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal due to the appellant's failure to adhere to the prescribed limitation period and nonobservance of Section 35F. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the dates provided by the appellant regarding the receipt of the order, ultimately determining that the appeal was time-barred as it was filed beyond the permissible period. Relying on legal precedent, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing that delays beyond the specified timeframe cannot be condoned. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on the issues of limitation and nonobservance of legal provisions. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381303 The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal due to the appellant's failure to adhere to the prescribed limitation period and nonobservance of Section 35F. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the dates provided by the appellant regarding the receipt of the order, ultimately determining that the appeal was time-barred as it was filed beyond the permissible period. Relying on legal precedent, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing that delays beyond the specified timeframe cannot be condoned. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on the issues of limitation and nonobservance of legal provisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381303