<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 379 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381302</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to reject a Partnership Firm&#039;s settlement application under Section 32-E of the Central Excise Act due to alleged failure to disclose the adjudication order, emphasizing the requirement for true and full disclosure in such applications. The Court dismissed the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to seek further legal remedies if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 379 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381302</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to reject a Partnership Firm&#039;s settlement application under Section 32-E of the Central Excise Act due to alleged failure to disclose the adjudication order, emphasizing the requirement for true and full disclosure in such applications. The Court dismissed the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to seek further legal remedies if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>