https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381301 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, aligning with Ultratech Cement's precedent and reaffirming the denial of Cenvat Credit for transport services beyond the factory gate to the buyer's premises post-amendment to Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The judgment underscores the significance of legal precedents and the authoritative nature of the Hon'ble Apex Court's decisions in interpreting and applying tax laws. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381301 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, aligning with Ultratech Cement's precedent and reaffirming the denial of Cenvat Credit for transport services beyond the factory gate to the buyer's premises post-amendment to Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The judgment underscores the significance of legal precedents and the authoritative nature of the Hon'ble Apex Court's decisions in interpreting and applying tax laws. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381301