https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381294 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed on the appellant for alleged failure to advise the importer correctly on the classification of goods. The Tribunal found that since no offense was committed under the Customs Act or Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, the penalty imposition was unwarranted. The appellant's argument that the penalty was unjustified as no specific basis was provided for its imposition was upheld, emphasizing that in cases where license revocation is not warranted, the imposition of a penalty is also not justified. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:35:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381294 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed on the appellant for alleged failure to advise the importer correctly on the classification of goods. The Tribunal found that since no offense was committed under the Customs Act or Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, the penalty imposition was unwarranted. The appellant's argument that the penalty was unjustified as no specific basis was provided for its imposition was upheld, emphasizing that in cases where license revocation is not warranted, the imposition of a penalty is also not justified. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381294