<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 367 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381290</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in the case with citation 2019 (6) TMI 367 - SC. Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi presided over the case. Counsel for the petitioner included Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Mr. Leelesh Krishna, and Mr. B. Krishna Prasad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 367 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381290</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in the case with citation 2019 (6) TMI 367 - SC. Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi presided over the case. Counsel for the petitioner included Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Mr. Leelesh Krishna, and Mr. B. Krishna Prasad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>