<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, ruling that denial of Cenvat Credit due to ISD registration issues and invoice deficiencies was unjustified. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement was dismissed as it was linked to the unsupported demand. Procedural irregularities should not negate substantive benefits when records are verifiable and no revenue loss occurs. The appellant was deemed eligible to claim credit for disputed input services under the expansive definition of input services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, ruling that denial of Cenvat Credit due to ISD registration issues and invoice deficiencies was unjustified. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement was dismissed as it was linked to the unsupported demand. Procedural irregularities should not negate substantive benefits when records are verifiable and no revenue loss occurs. The appellant was deemed eligible to claim credit for disputed input services under the expansive definition of input services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>