<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381281</link>
    <description>The writ challenge to a taxing order was treated as unsuitable for writ jurisdiction because the petitioner had already used the statutory appeal and the appellate tribunal remained available to consider all grounds, including alleged denial of relied-upon documents and natural justice concerns. The Court also noted that the revenue had placed the relied-upon documents on record, so the grievance of non-furnishing could not be accepted on the materials before it. As the dispute involved factual controversy, the writ petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed, with liberty to pursue the alternative statutory remedy before the appellate tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:25:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381281</link>
      <description>The writ challenge to a taxing order was treated as unsuitable for writ jurisdiction because the petitioner had already used the statutory appeal and the appellate tribunal remained available to consider all grounds, including alleged denial of relied-upon documents and natural justice concerns. The Court also noted that the revenue had placed the relied-upon documents on record, so the grievance of non-furnishing could not be accepted on the materials before it. As the dispute involved factual controversy, the writ petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed, with liberty to pursue the alternative statutory remedy before the appellate tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>