https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381280 The Commission ruled in favor of the complainant, who sought a refund and compensation due to delay in possession of a residential unit. The opposite party failed to justify the delay citing legal and environmental factors. The Commission held that cancellation charges were inapplicable as the delay was not due to the complainant's actions. The complainant was entitled to a refund of the principal amount along with compensation in the form of simple interest. The opposite party was ordered to refund the principal amount, pay compensation with interest, cover litigation costs, and make the payment within three months. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:23:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381280 The Commission ruled in favor of the complainant, who sought a refund and compensation due to delay in possession of a residential unit. The opposite party failed to justify the delay citing legal and environmental factors. The Commission held that cancellation charges were inapplicable as the delay was not due to the complainant's actions. The complainant was entitled to a refund of the principal amount along with compensation in the form of simple interest. The opposite party was ordered to refund the principal amount, pay compensation with interest, cover litigation costs, and make the payment within three months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381280