<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1891 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281204</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the jurisdiction issue, remanding the case for further consideration. The decision on the liability of service tax for professional fees and royalty payments was not conclusively determined, with the focus primarily on the jurisdictional matter. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of services provided by foreign professionals and the alleged double taxation on royalty charges were acknowledged but not definitively resolved. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the right to present a defense, ensuring a comprehensive review of the jurisdictional aspect before addressing the substantive service tax liability issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1891 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281204</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the jurisdiction issue, remanding the case for further consideration. The decision on the liability of service tax for professional fees and royalty payments was not conclusively determined, with the focus primarily on the jurisdictional matter. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of services provided by foreign professionals and the alleged double taxation on royalty charges were acknowledged but not definitively resolved. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the right to present a defense, ensuring a comprehensive review of the jurisdictional aspect before addressing the substantive service tax liability issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>