<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1770 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281202</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because no one appeared for the appellant and no adjournment request was made. The tribunal recorded that the appellant was not serious in prosecuting the appeal and accordingly terminated the proceedings without examining the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1770 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281202</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because no one appeared for the appellant and no adjournment request was made. The tribunal recorded that the appellant was not serious in prosecuting the appeal and accordingly terminated the proceedings without examining the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>