<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1657 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281197</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the undisclosed income admitted during the search under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal highlighted the lack of incriminating evidence and the assessee&#039;s retraction of the disclosure as key factors in supporting the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1657 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281197</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the undisclosed income admitted during the search under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal highlighted the lack of incriminating evidence and the assessee&#039;s retraction of the disclosure as key factors in supporting the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>