https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281193 In an NDPS prosecution under Section 21, the Kerala HC held that the entire seized mixture containing heroin, a manufactured drug, was relevant and that purity percentage did not reduce liability or affect sentence where possession was proved. It further found that Section 42 safeguards were complied with because the information was reduced into writing and forwarded to the superior officer. On the evidence, including the seizure mahazar, independent witness testimony and chemical analysis, recovery of heroin from the accused was established, so the conviction for possession of a manufactured drug was sustained and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281193 In an NDPS prosecution under Section 21, the Kerala HC held that the entire seized mixture containing heroin, a manufactured drug, was relevant and that purity percentage did not reduce liability or affect sentence where possession was proved. It further found that Section 42 safeguards were complied with because the information was reduced into writing and forwarded to the superior officer. On the evidence, including the seizure mahazar, independent witness testimony and chemical analysis, recovery of heroin from the accused was established, so the conviction for possession of a manufactured drug was sustained and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281193