https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381278 The Court directed the petitioner to seek redressal through the Appellate Forum for challenges to the provisional attachment order under Section 281B, emphasizing that factual matters should be examined by the appellate authority, not under writ jurisdiction. Regarding the assessment order under Section 143(3), the Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within three weeks for appellate scrutiny, ensuring consideration on merits without limitation objections. The consequential demand notice under Section 156 was also challenged but was not the primary focus of the judgment, which highlighted the importance of addressing disputes through the appropriate appellate channels rather than writ jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381278 The Court directed the petitioner to seek redressal through the Appellate Forum for challenges to the provisional attachment order under Section 281B, emphasizing that factual matters should be examined by the appellate authority, not under writ jurisdiction. Regarding the assessment order under Section 143(3), the Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within three weeks for appellate scrutiny, ensuring consideration on merits without limitation objections. The consequential demand notice under Section 156 was also challenged but was not the primary focus of the judgment, which highlighted the importance of addressing disputes through the appropriate appellate channels rather than writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381278