<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 331 - NATIONAL COMPALY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381254</link>
    <description>The NCLT found the removal of the 1st respondent as Director invalid due to procedural irregularities but upheld the removal as Managing Director. Compensation of Rs. 105 lakhs was awarded for loss of office, with the direction to purchase shares. The Financial Collaboration Agreement was deemed non-binding, and allegations of oppression and mismanagement were not substantiated. The NCLT&#039;s decision was upheld on appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 331 - NATIONAL COMPALY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381254</link>
      <description>The NCLT found the removal of the 1st respondent as Director invalid due to procedural irregularities but upheld the removal as Managing Director. Compensation of Rs. 105 lakhs was awarded for loss of office, with the direction to purchase shares. The Financial Collaboration Agreement was deemed non-binding, and allegations of oppression and mismanagement were not substantiated. The NCLT&#039;s decision was upheld on appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>