https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381251 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of service tax confirmed by invoking the extended period of limitation. It was determined that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit for the service tax paid, indicating the absence of malafide intention in non-payment. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable in this case due to the lack of malafides, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2019 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381251 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of service tax confirmed by invoking the extended period of limitation. It was determined that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit for the service tax paid, indicating the absence of malafide intention in non-payment. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable in this case due to the lack of malafides, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381251