<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 324 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381247</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the review application was condoned after the Court accepted the affidavit-supported explanation. The review was allowed because the earlier dismissal order had been passed without knowledge that the Tribunal order forming its basis was already under challenge and pending in another appeal. On that footing, the Court found sufficient reason to interfere, recalled the order dated 7.5.2018, and restored the appeal to its original number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 07:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 324 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381247</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the review application was condoned after the Court accepted the affidavit-supported explanation. The review was allowed because the earlier dismissal order had been passed without knowledge that the Tribunal order forming its basis was already under challenge and pending in another appeal. On that footing, the Court found sufficient reason to interfere, recalled the order dated 7.5.2018, and restored the appeal to its original number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>