https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381236 Where a works contract expressly provides for arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, that contractual choice governs and is not displaced by the Bihar Public Works Contract Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008. Relying on Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. and Nilkamal Ltd., the Patna HC held that the State Act did not override the agreed Central Act mechanism on these facts. The earlier direction to approach the Bihar Tribunal therefore could not stand, and the review was allowed with recall of that order. en-us Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jun 2019 07:26:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381236 Where a works contract expressly provides for arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, that contractual choice governs and is not displaced by the Bihar Public Works Contract Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008. Relying on Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. and Nilkamal Ltd., the Patna HC held that the State Act did not override the agreed Central Act mechanism on these facts. The earlier direction to approach the Bihar Tribunal therefore could not stand, and the review was allowed with recall of that order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381236