https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281187 The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose in the Revenue's appeal because the Tribunal had followed an earlier decision on the same issue concerning the excisability of electricity sold to the grid and the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs used in its generation. The Revenue did not show that the earlier Tribunal view had been challenged by the department, and no basis was established to depart from that precedent. The appeal was therefore dismissed in favour of the assessee. en-us Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2019 21:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281187 The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose in the Revenue's appeal because the Tribunal had followed an earlier decision on the same issue concerning the excisability of electricity sold to the grid and the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs used in its generation. The Revenue did not show that the earlier Tribunal view had been challenged by the department, and no basis was established to depart from that precedent. The appeal was therefore dismissed in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281187