https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281184 The Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging orders under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, emphasizing the availability of an alternate remedy under the Act. The petitioners, facing allegations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, were directed to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 26 of the PMLA for further redressal, including seeking stay orders if necessary. The Court highlighted that the petitioners had previously challenged similar orders and were advised to pursue their remedies under the PMLA, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions. en-us Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2019 21:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281184 The Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging orders under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, emphasizing the availability of an alternate remedy under the Act. The petitioners, facing allegations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, were directed to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 26 of the PMLA for further redressal, including seeking stay orders if necessary. The Court highlighted that the petitioners had previously challenged similar orders and were advised to pursue their remedies under the PMLA, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281184