<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 76 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18430</link>
    <description>A beneficial administrative circular directing that pending acquisition proceedings under Chapter XX-A be dropped applies to proceedings still pending in appeal, because the term &quot;proceedings&quot; is not confined to the initial stage before the competent authority. The statutory scheme did not justify treating appellate matters differently from other pending matters, and there was no rational basis to limit the circular to earlier stages alone. However, proceedings that had already attained finality were not reopened in the absence of express language. On that basis, the pending acquisition appeals were covered by the circular and the acquisition order could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 76 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18430</link>
      <description>A beneficial administrative circular directing that pending acquisition proceedings under Chapter XX-A be dropped applies to proceedings still pending in appeal, because the term &quot;proceedings&quot; is not confined to the initial stage before the competent authority. The statutory scheme did not justify treating appellate matters differently from other pending matters, and there was no rational basis to limit the circular to earlier stages alone. However, proceedings that had already attained finality were not reopened in the absence of express language. On that basis, the pending acquisition appeals were covered by the circular and the acquisition order could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>