<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 110 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18429</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the application seeking direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer a question of law regarding the ownership of a house property by a deceased liquor contractor&#039;s spouse. The Tribunal did not conclusively determine the applicability of section 64(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, making the proposed question ineligible for reference to the High Court under section 256. The Court deemed the application futile, allowing the applicant to raise the question in the future if necessary. The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous civil cases without costs but fixed counsel fees for each side, emphasizing the necessity for a question of law directly arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order for a valid reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 110 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18429</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the application seeking direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer a question of law regarding the ownership of a house property by a deceased liquor contractor&#039;s spouse. The Tribunal did not conclusively determine the applicability of section 64(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, making the proposed question ineligible for reference to the High Court under section 256. The Court deemed the application futile, allowing the applicant to raise the question in the future if necessary. The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous civil cases without costs but fixed counsel fees for each side, emphasizing the necessity for a question of law directly arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order for a valid reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>