<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 11,22,090 as unexplained cash in hand. The Tribunal criticized the authorities for not verifying sales and purchases directly and concluded that the evidence presented by the assessee was credible, leading to the deletion of the entire addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 11,22,090 as unexplained cash in hand. The Tribunal criticized the authorities for not verifying sales and purchases directly and concluded that the evidence presented by the assessee was credible, leading to the deletion of the entire addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>