<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Ad Spending as Revenue Expense, Not Capital; No Enduring Benefit Justifies Intangible Asset Classification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47027</link>
    <description>Nature of advertisement expenditure - revenue or capital - public memory is very short and, therefore, the companies have to incur advertisement expenditure year after year to keep products fresh in the minds of the public hence such expenditure cannot partake the character of giving any enduring benefit - AO has grossly erred in treating such expenditure as intangible asset - revenue Exp.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Ad Spending as Revenue Expense, Not Capital; No Enduring Benefit Justifies Intangible Asset Classification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47027</link>
      <description>Nature of advertisement expenditure - revenue or capital - public memory is very short and, therefore, the companies have to incur advertisement expenditure year after year to keep products fresh in the minds of the public hence such expenditure cannot partake the character of giving any enduring benefit - AO has grossly erred in treating such expenditure as intangible asset - revenue Exp.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>