<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 278 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to include technical know-how fees and royalty charges in the assessable value of imported goods, emphasizing that such payments were not a precondition for the supply of goods and were solely for the manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal ruled that the relationship between the parties did not impact pricing patterns, therefore rejecting the addition of these fees to the value of the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 278 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to include technical know-how fees and royalty charges in the assessable value of imported goods, emphasizing that such payments were not a precondition for the supply of goods and were solely for the manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal ruled that the relationship between the parties did not impact pricing patterns, therefore rejecting the addition of these fees to the value of the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>