https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381190 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, a construction services provider, regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit for input services received before registration. The Tribunal found that the appellant, registered at the Wardha office and later in Mumbai, was entitled to the credit despite the revenue department's rejection. Penalties were set aside, and the appellant was directed to provide additional information for verification. The decision underscored the significance of proper registration and compliance for claiming tax credits, ultimately allowing the appeal and granting the appellant the CENVAT credit. en-us Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:07:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381190 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, a construction services provider, regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit for input services received before registration. The Tribunal found that the appellant, registered at the Wardha office and later in Mumbai, was entitled to the credit despite the revenue department's rejection. Penalties were set aside, and the appellant was directed to provide additional information for verification. The decision underscored the significance of proper registration and compliance for claiming tax credits, ultimately allowing the appeal and granting the appellant the CENVAT credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381190