<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 266 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381189</link>
    <description>Delay in re-filing was condoned, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The withdrawal was expressly not treated as affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the revenue was granted liberty to seek revival of the appeal if necessary. The legal issue was left open for determination in an appropriate case, so no substantive adjudication on the merits was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 266 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381189</link>
      <description>Delay in re-filing was condoned, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The withdrawal was expressly not treated as affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the revenue was granted liberty to seek revival of the appeal if necessary. The legal issue was left open for determination in an appropriate case, so no substantive adjudication on the merits was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>