<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s view on interest for non-deposit of advance tax, in relation to consideration received by a non-resident assessee, was based on binding precedents of the High Court. As the Tribunal had followed the Court&#039;s established rulings on advance tax liability and the levy of interest, the challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The High Court therefore declined interference and dismissed the appeals as untenable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s view on interest for non-deposit of advance tax, in relation to consideration received by a non-resident assessee, was based on binding precedents of the High Court. As the Tribunal had followed the Court&#039;s established rulings on advance tax liability and the levy of interest, the challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The High Court therefore declined interference and dismissed the appeals as untenable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>