<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1636 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act concerning Long Term Capital Gains on the sale of shares. The decision was based on the extensive evidence provided by the assessee and the precedents established by the Jurisdictional High Court and the ITAT Kolkata in similar cases. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence-based decisions and adherence to legal precedents, ultimately overturning the rejection of the claim of Long Term Capital Gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1636 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act concerning Long Term Capital Gains on the sale of shares. The decision was based on the extensive evidence provided by the assessee and the precedents established by the Jurisdictional High Court and the ITAT Kolkata in similar cases. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence-based decisions and adherence to legal precedents, ultimately overturning the rejection of the claim of Long Term Capital Gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>