<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 562 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281154</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because an earlier set of directly analogous Civil Appeals had already been dismissed on the same question. The Court treated that prior dismissal as covering the present matter, so no further adjudication on the merits was required. The operative effect was that the earlier decision functioned as controlling precedent for disposing of the instant appeal, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 15:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 562 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281154</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because an earlier set of directly analogous Civil Appeals had already been dismissed on the same question. The Court treated that prior dismissal as covering the present matter, so no further adjudication on the merits was required. The operative effect was that the earlier decision functioned as controlling precedent for disposing of the instant appeal, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>