<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 253 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381176</link>
    <description>The court allowed the restoration of a previously dismissed petition. However, the petition seeking an inquiry into the source of funds and tax evasion action was dismissed as untimely, as the payments in question were made outside the assessment period. The court concluded that no further directions could be given to reexamine the tax assessments of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 253 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381176</link>
      <description>The court allowed the restoration of a previously dismissed petition. However, the petition seeking an inquiry into the source of funds and tax evasion action was dismissed as untimely, as the payments in question were made outside the assessment period. The court concluded that no further directions could be given to reexamine the tax assessments of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>