<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee did not qualify for the deduction under Section 54F due to the new property being purchased outside the stipulated period and improvements made to an already acquired property not meeting the deduction criteria. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the disallowance of the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee did not qualify for the deduction under Section 54F due to the new property being purchased outside the stipulated period and improvements made to an already acquired property not meeting the deduction criteria. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the disallowance of the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>