<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 226 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381149</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the authorities to finalize proceedings regarding the confiscation of LED drivers due to a mismatch with the BIS certificate after hearing the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to approach the respondent for the release of remaining goods, excluding the confiscated items, which the respondent was instructed to release promptly. The judgment outlined a procedure for concluding proceedings on the confiscated goods, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner. Additionally, the petitioner was instructed to apply for a waiver of demurrage and detention charges, with the authority required to review the request and grant a personal hearing before making a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 226 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381149</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the authorities to finalize proceedings regarding the confiscation of LED drivers due to a mismatch with the BIS certificate after hearing the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to approach the respondent for the release of remaining goods, excluding the confiscated items, which the respondent was instructed to release promptly. The judgment outlined a procedure for concluding proceedings on the confiscated goods, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner. Additionally, the petitioner was instructed to apply for a waiver of demurrage and detention charges, with the authority required to review the request and grant a personal hearing before making a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>