<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 208 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381131</link>
    <description>Composite construction activity involving transfer of goods constituted a works contract and could not be taxed under pre-existing commercial or industrial construction or construction of complex service entries before works contract taxation took effect. Where the main contractor had discharged service tax, liability did not survive against the sub-contractor on the stated facts. Free-supplied material values could not be included in taxable value. Extended limitation was unavailable for the subsequent notice because suppression of facts was not established. Consequently, the demand, interest and penalties failed, with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 208 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381131</link>
      <description>Composite construction activity involving transfer of goods constituted a works contract and could not be taxed under pre-existing commercial or industrial construction or construction of complex service entries before works contract taxation took effect. Where the main contractor had discharged service tax, liability did not survive against the sub-contractor on the stated facts. Free-supplied material values could not be included in taxable value. Extended limitation was unavailable for the subsequent notice because suppression of facts was not established. Consequently, the demand, interest and penalties failed, with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>