https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381116 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty on seized goods, confiscation order, and penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the Appellant to duty payment obligations or manufacturing activities, emphasizing the need for clear liability before imposing such obligations. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:04:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381116 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty on seized goods, confiscation order, and penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the Appellant to duty payment obligations or manufacturing activities, emphasizing the need for clear liability before imposing such obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381116