<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381114</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty cannot be demanded on goods destroyed in the factory without specific legal provision. The demand for CENVAT credit on destroyed goods was set aside, and the penalty imposed was annulled. The appellant&#039;s reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs was deemed adequate, and no further demand was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381114</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty cannot be demanded on goods destroyed in the factory without specific legal provision. The demand for CENVAT credit on destroyed goods was set aside, and the penalty imposed was annulled. The appellant&#039;s reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs was deemed adequate, and no further demand was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>