<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 182 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on the sale of capital goods without reversing CENVAT credit, ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims, the time-barred nature of the demand, and the absence of suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal was allowed based on the unsustainable nature of the demand both on merit and limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 07:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 182 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on the sale of capital goods without reversing CENVAT credit, ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims, the time-barred nature of the demand, and the absence of suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal was allowed based on the unsustainable nature of the demand both on merit and limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>