https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381102 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking to quash an order under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and direction for interest levy, citing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal. Relying on established legal principles, the Court emphasized that interference through writ jurisdiction is not warranted when effective statutory remedies exist. The Court referred to precedents to support this stance and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy as per the law, thereby emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 07:55:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381102 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking to quash an order under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and direction for interest levy, citing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal. Relying on established legal principles, the Court emphasized that interference through writ jurisdiction is not warranted when effective statutory remedies exist. The Court referred to precedents to support this stance and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy as per the law, thereby emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381102