https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381100 A writ challenge to rejection of a recall application under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was treated as untenable where the earlier rejection had not been challenged in time, the impugned endorsement only repeated that position, and the assessee had failed to produce books of accounts despite repeated notices. The Court found the writ invocation grossly delayed and unsupported by merit, and the challenge to the endorsement was dismissed, leaving the rejection of the recall request undisturbed. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 07:54:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381100 A writ challenge to rejection of a recall application under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was treated as untenable where the earlier rejection had not been challenged in time, the impugned endorsement only repeated that position, and the assessee had failed to produce books of accounts despite repeated notices. The Court found the writ invocation grossly delayed and unsupported by merit, and the challenge to the endorsement was dismissed, leaving the rejection of the recall request undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381100