https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381098 A writ challenge to assessment-related notices and orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was declined because a statutory revision under Section 59 remained available. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue that revisional remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction on the limitation objection raised against action under Section 56. To preserve the petitioner's position pending revision, the Court directed that no coercive steps be taken under the impugned order until the revision was decided and the order was communicated. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 07:48:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381098 A writ challenge to assessment-related notices and orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was declined because a statutory revision under Section 59 remained available. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue that revisional remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction on the limitation objection raised against action under Section 56. To preserve the petitioner's position pending revision, the Court directed that no coercive steps be taken under the impugned order until the revision was decided and the order was communicated. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381098