https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381096 Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was applied to support a 20% pre-deposit condition, with the court treating it as a permissible statutory safeguard and finding no sufficient basis to reduce the amount. A challenge based on Section 143 was rejected in the stated circumstances. On default, the court considered cancellation of bail too onerous and instead confined the consequence to the appeal not being entertained if the amount was not deposited within time. The impugned order was otherwise sustained, with only the default consequence modified. en-us Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 07:42:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381096 Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was applied to support a 20% pre-deposit condition, with the court treating it as a permissible statutory safeguard and finding no sufficient basis to reduce the amount. A challenge based on Section 143 was rejected in the stated circumstances. On default, the court considered cancellation of bail too onerous and instead confined the consequence to the appeal not being entertained if the amount was not deposited within time. The impugned order was otherwise sustained, with only the default consequence modified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381096