<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18399</link>
    <description>The High Court refused to refer questions of law to the High Court regarding penalty under the Wealth-tax Act due to the applicant&#039;s absence during the hearing. The court emphasized that non-appearance by the applicant hindered the proceedings and justified the rejection based on legal precedent and provisions. The judgment highlighted the necessity of active participation by parties in legal processes to ensure fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18399</link>
      <description>The High Court refused to refer questions of law to the High Court regarding penalty under the Wealth-tax Act due to the applicant&#039;s absence during the hearing. The court emphasized that non-appearance by the applicant hindered the proceedings and justified the rejection based on legal precedent and provisions. The judgment highlighted the necessity of active participation by parties in legal processes to ensure fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>