<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 167 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381090</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by converting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (FIRP) and extending the CIRP beyond the prescribed 270 days. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) also lacked jurisdiction to replace the Resolution Professional (RP) after 270 days. Additionally, the Adjudicating Authority did not have the power to decide the resolution cost, including the RP&#039;s fee. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Adjudicating Authority to pass an appropriate order under Section 31 or Section 33. An interim sum was paid to the Appellant, to be adjusted based on the determined Resolution Cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 167 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381090</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by converting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (FIRP) and extending the CIRP beyond the prescribed 270 days. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) also lacked jurisdiction to replace the Resolution Professional (RP) after 270 days. Additionally, the Adjudicating Authority did not have the power to decide the resolution cost, including the RP&#039;s fee. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Adjudicating Authority to pass an appropriate order under Section 31 or Section 33. An interim sum was paid to the Appellant, to be adjusted based on the determined Resolution Cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>