https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381089 The tribunal concluded that the transaction between the parties constituted a slump sale of a going concern, not the provision of franchise services. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable on merits and due to the limitation period. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381089 The tribunal concluded that the transaction between the parties constituted a slump sale of a going concern, not the provision of franchise services. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable on merits and due to the limitation period. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381089