https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281133 A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is ordinarily not maintainable where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists under the SARFAESI Act. The availability of an alternative remedy operates as a rule of self-imposed restraint in writ jurisdiction, and the statutory forum should generally be exhausted first. The High Court may interfere only in exceptional cases such as violation of natural justice, jurisdictional defect, or other recognised grounds. Here, the petitioners had a specific appellate remedy and also raised disputed questions of fact, which made writ intervention inappropriate. The petition was therefore held not maintainable and interference was declined. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281133 A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is ordinarily not maintainable where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists under the SARFAESI Act. The availability of an alternative remedy operates as a rule of self-imposed restraint in writ jurisdiction, and the statutory forum should generally be exhausted first. The High Court may interfere only in exceptional cases such as violation of natural justice, jurisdictional defect, or other recognised grounds. Here, the petitioners had a specific appellate remedy and also raised disputed questions of fact, which made writ intervention inappropriate. The petition was therefore held not maintainable and interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281133