<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1836 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281130</link>
    <description>Both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn: one at the appellant&#039;s request, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal under the Board&#039;s litigation policy because the disputed amount was below the threshold prescribed in the relevant instruction. The order reflects application of the tax litigation management policy rather than any adjudication on the merits, and it leaves the substantive dispute unresolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1836 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281130</link>
      <description>Both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn: one at the appellant&#039;s request, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal under the Board&#039;s litigation policy because the disputed amount was below the threshold prescribed in the relevant instruction. The order reflects application of the tax litigation management policy rather than any adjudication on the merits, and it leaves the substantive dispute unresolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>