<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the notice under section 143(2) was not served within the prescribed time and mode, rendering the assessment order void ab-initio. As a result, the assessment order dated 10/11/2003 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. All other grounds raised by the assessee regarding the merits of the additions were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the notice under section 143(2) was not served within the prescribed time and mode, rendering the assessment order void ab-initio. As a result, the assessment order dated 10/11/2003 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. All other grounds raised by the assessee regarding the merits of the additions were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>