<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1655 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281141</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition became infructuous because counsel informed the SC that the underlying suit had been dismissed. The Court therefore dismissed the petition as having become infructuous, while noting that if the suit is restored, the petitioner may pursue an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1655 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281141</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition became infructuous because counsel informed the SC that the underlying suit had been dismissed. The Court therefore dismissed the petition as having become infructuous, while noting that if the suit is restored, the petitioner may pursue an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>