<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1698 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281139</link>
    <description>The court partly allowed the appeal. It ruled in favor of the department regarding the amortization of cost under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. However, the court sided with the assessee on the issues of depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii), business expenditure under Section 37, and deduction under Section 80IA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1698 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281139</link>
      <description>The court partly allowed the appeal. It ruled in favor of the department regarding the amortization of cost under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. However, the court sided with the assessee on the issues of depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii), business expenditure under Section 37, and deduction under Section 80IA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>