<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1458 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281136</link>
    <description>The court upheld the classification of compensation paid to landowners for mineral extraction as revenue expenditure, allowed the deduction for contribution to the State Renewal Fund and contributions to Social Welfare Activities, affirmed the classification of income from the sale of Carbon Emission Reduction Certificates as capital income, and permitted the deduction for Mines Closure Expenses. The appeal was dismissed, and all issues were resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1458 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281136</link>
      <description>The court upheld the classification of compensation paid to landowners for mineral extraction as revenue expenditure, allowed the deduction for contribution to the State Renewal Fund and contributions to Social Welfare Activities, affirmed the classification of income from the sale of Carbon Emission Reduction Certificates as capital income, and permitted the deduction for Mines Closure Expenses. The appeal was dismissed, and all issues were resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>